The Gadget Story - The Story | The Court Case Of | |
HUGH V. FORD | HUGH V. FORD | |
Canada's Modern Day Lynching Of A Black Man By Peel Regional Police |
INDEX | ||||||||||||
|
Continued: Peel's Finest Gets.... -A Minus It has already been discovered that the Peel Regional Police Vice Unit, controlled the Dancers ability to work within Brampton Strip Clubs. By forcing the women from their jobs, and pressuring them into becoming "victims" for the Police. Several girls reported threats and insults against them if they were unwilling to comply. Still today, several women have not been able to return to work in the Brampton strip clubs owned by Jon Sit (Pok Hon Sit) To help make up their case, Peel Police Officers offered cash incentives for statements, and the prospect at having criminal charges dropped as an added bonus for the "victims" to participate. Sadly, the men who have already walked down the road of the wrongfully accused and the wrongfully convicted, know these and similar tactics of their own Police Department, all too well. Hugh Ford was arrested on September 22, 2006 at his home in Brampton Ontario, for allegedly uttering a false document. - for which he was never charged. An article circulated through several newspapers was released on Oct 3rd, 2006. One being from the Brampton Guardian written by Pam Douglass. The Reporter, had received information provided by Det. Randy Cowan #1195 of The Peel Regional Police, detailing the events and arrest. (The article can be downloaded here) The 2006 article laid claims by Det. Randy Cowan #1195 that seven (7) girls were led from the strip club as a result of the 2 week investigation. After 3 years none of the 7 Girls have been produced by the Peel Regional Police or the courts. All of the "Victims" noted below were generated by The Peel Regional Police weeks and months after the arrest of Hugh Ford, and after the newspaper article by published by Pam Douglass of The Brampton Guardian. (2006 Brampton Guardian Article) Despite the multitude of conflicting and perjured statements of witnesses both civilian and officers involved, to date, one basic fact seems to remain stagnant and has been reiterated many times by all: A discussion of the past that was linked to a Group of young boys, and the events that transpired in an oppressed neighborhood and an empty police cruiser in 1986.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||